What USRPT got Wrong…(and right)

Ultra-Short Race Pace Training gained a little bit of popularity with Michael Andrew and his rise to swimming fame. Some people hoped on but most everyone remained skeptical. I’ve thought about this recently in different contexts and

I believe that it did get a few things right that the swimming community is gravely missing.

BUT

I also believe it’s not the answer because it got some crucial things wrong.

It operates on 2 foundations: 1) Neurologically more speed at race pace = better race and 2) Managing fatigue

What it got right:

USRPT utilized specificity. Specificity of practice is the best way to create neurological adaptations. Swimming in general seems to be missing specificity.

In terms of learning and deliberate practice. The best training reflects the demands of competition.

-          Similar Emotional/Mental States

-          Similar Physiological Demands

-          Similar Environmental Stressors

What it got wrong:

What USRPT DOESN’T do is utilize specificity of practice setting that promotes efficient learning.

Doing the same thing repeatedly is the best way to learn but this reduces cognitive load = lowers learning.

This type of Blocked practice WILL 1) Feel good 2) Improve confidence of user 3) Decrease performance over time.

Random practice PROMOTES cognitive activity and leads to greater learning. It 1) Does not feel as good/comfortable, 2) May not improve confidence, 3) Increase Performance.

Getting good at one thing may feel good but staying right over the bounds of your comfort zone promotes greater learning and performance.